GLOBAL WARMING HOAX REVEALED!!!

The most intelligent man who ever lived
shows his opinion on climate change.
(Picture from Time Magazine)

Sensational disclosure by US President Donald Trump proves climate science conspiracy hoax with startling revelations about the trees in California and how small the oceans are.

Anyone concerned about recent inflammatory reports about global warming by the entire scientific community, can rest assured that there is no need to worry. Thanks to the intervention of US President Donald Trump, the truth about all of this can now be disclosed.

Josh Dawsey of the Washington Post asked the President for his reaction to the latest report and his reply can be read here.

"One of the problems that a lot of people like myself. 

We have very high levels of intelligence, but we're not necessarily such believers. 

You look at our air and our water and it's right now at a record clean. But when you look at China and you look at parts of Asia and when you look at South America, and when you look at many other places in the world, including Russia, including – just many other places – the air is incredibly dirty. 

And when you're talking about an atmosphere. 

Oceans are very small. 

And it blows over and it sails over. 

I mean, we take thousands of tons of garbage off our beaches all the time that comes over from Asia. It just flows right down the Pacific, it flows, and we say where does this come from? 

And it takes many people to start off with.

Number two, if you go back and look at articles, they talked about global freezing, they talked about at some point the planet could have freez [sic] to death, then it's going to die of heat exhaustion. 

There is movement in the atmosphere. 

There's no question. 

As to whether or not it's man-made and whether or not the effects that you are talking about are there, I don't see it – not nearly like it is. 

Do we want clean water? Absolutely. Do we want clean air to breath? Absolutely. 

The fire in California, where I was, if you looked at the floor, the floor of the fire they have trees that were fallen, they did no forest management, no forest maintenance, and you can light – you can take a match like this and light a tree trunk when that thing is laying there for more than 14 or 15 months. 

And it's a massive problem in California."

The reference to the recent forest fires in California follow his imaginary conversation with Finland President Sauli Niinistö who told him that they don't have such fires in Finland because they do a lot of raking.

This isn't the first time we have been treated to the views of President Trump on matters of climate change. My earlier post dated 22nd August 2018 gave a transcription of his speech at a fund raising dinner in New York regarding the wisdom of burning more coal.

A (FAR) RIGHT TURN UP FOR THE BOOKS

Massive turnout of EDL supporters as Tommy
Robinson appointed as adviser to UKIP.

Nigel Farage, founder of far-right political party UKIP has expressed his disappointment that a neo-Nazi thug has been taken on by his neo-Nazi party as a special adviser. Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (otherwise known as Tommy Robinson) is now going to be advising UKIP on rape gangs and prison reform.

The latest UKIP leader Gerard Batten (is it my imagination, or do UKIP go through more leaders than the Tories go through Brexit negotiators?) claims that Yaxley-Lennon has "saved the party from oblivion". 

I'm not sure if that should be held against him though. While it's perfectly true that he has a long history of thuggery, drug dealing and, more recently, attempting to get rape case defendants acquitted by sabotaging their trials, I don't think he can honestly be accused of saving this bunch of knuckle-dragging half-wits and their sad excuse of a political party. They are on their way down the toilet as many of their former supporters head back to the BNP, where they came from in the first place.

This story, doing the rounds on Facebook has been around for a few years but it's still worth another outing. Thanks to Mrs Grump for the heads-up.

In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. 

The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, penned by a US resident, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:

"Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighbouring nations. 
A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. 
The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.

4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odour for the Lord - Lev.1:9. 
The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

5. I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. 
Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?

7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help.

Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your adoring fan.

James M. Kauffman, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus, Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia
(It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian)"

THE LEATHER BOTTLE

A sad end to an old Belvedere tradition. Large parts of the building have been destroyed along with the famous garden.

A number of stories have appeared lately regarding the fate of the Old Leather Bottle in Belvedere. Other local bloggers have mentioned it (Hugh Neal of Arthur Pewty's Maggot Sandwich and Malcolm Knight of Bexley is Bonkers to name but two). Unlike both of them however, I was very much a regular visitor for much of my adult life and am, for one, sorry to see it go. 

My earliest recollection of the Leather Bottle would have been in 1967. This was when I first started visiting the pub with a group of friends. We would drink in what was the public bar and play on the pinball machine. 

At the time, the layout of the pub was typical of the 1960's where there was what was called a "Public Bar." The entrance to the public bar was the one you can see in the photograph and was a room with a very basic layout comprising a large bar, cheap furniture and cheap beer. It was also an exclusively male preserve where the men could carry on their manly pursuits such as spitting, swearing and farting, and escape from 'her at home' for a few hours. Women did occasionally go into the public bar but usually this was only to drag their menfolk out if they had stayed too long.

At the other end of the pub was the "Saloon Bar." This was a rather better appointed room with a carpet on the floor. If there were extra cushions on the chairs, it might even be called the "Lounge Bar." The booze was more expensive too. 

It was acceptable for ladies go into the Saloon Bar but only if accompanied by a gentleman. Interestingly enough, the usual custom of permitting the lady to enter a room first was stood on its head and the gentleman would always enter the bar first, followed by the lady. I'm not entirely sure why this was the case. I was told once that it was so the gentleman could make sure that there would be nothing inside that the lady might find offensive before letting her in. I was also told that it was to make sure that no-one thought the lady might be entering by herself. (A definite no-no almost into the 1980's in London).

It's also worth mentioning that gentlemen would be expected to wear a tie in the saloon bar, no scruffy appearance would be permitted.

In the Leather Bottle, and sandwiched between the two main bars was a small "Private Bar." Lots of pubs had them and the Leather Bottle one had an interesting bar top made from old pennies which had been varnished to make a work surface.

Ladies could sit in the private bar without being accompanied by a man, although even then, they would not usually sit alone, and would still not usually be allowed to order their own drinks. Their Husbands, drinking in the public bar, would order their drinks them for them; or sometimes, there was an arrangement where they would order drinks from their table which would be brought over to them.

There would have to be at least two, usually quite elderly ladies plus one who would be much younger. I have never watched Coronation Street but I remember in the early days there used to be a couple of old biddies sitting in the private bar of the Rover's Return. I remember the names Ena Sharples and Minnie Caldwell but I can't for the life of me remember the name of the third one. This was a typical private bar arrangement.

From 1968 onwards, I was in the RAF and didn't go back to the Leather Bottle until the late 1970's. By this time there was a couple running the place who could have grumped for England. A more miserable pair of sods you could not imagine, with a regular barmaid who was cut from the same block and could, I swear, curdle the beer from fifty paces. Not that she needed to, the whole place was filthy and run down. What you got from the beer pumps was anyone's guess and was the start of me only drinking beer that came in bottles.

The Middle bar, as it was called by then was the preserve of a group of bikers, which was of great benefit to the Landlord because, contrary to popular reputation, bikers tend to be a generally law abiding bunch and not given to starting fights when drunk. And, because of aforesaid reputation, prevented anyone else from causing any trouble because they were scared of the bikers. 

Fortunately, the pub passed into the hands of people who had grand plans for the place and this saw the old public bar being upgraded and the old saloon bar being turned into a restaurant. George and Marina (and I have forgotten their surname) had come from the King's Head in Bexley. They made the Leather Bottle a real 'place to visit.' The restaurant had a great reputation; well deserved, I might add.

In those days, the place was packed most nights so I benefited from the fact that the pub staff could see me approaching as I walked past the window in the corner of the bar and would have my pint waiting for me by the time I reached the bar. This saved me valuable drinking time as I didn't have to wait to be served like all the other peasants.

I moved to Thamesmead in the early 1990's and so started using the Cutty Sark as my regular watering hole. I did visit the Leather Bottle a few times after that but not often.

While I was taking pictures of the demolished garden, I couldn't help but worry about the incredible steep slope dug out of the hill. I assume the people doing this know their business but I wouldn't want to be the owner of the property at the top of that slope. One good few days of rain and I can see the whole thing becoming really unstable.

One other point I would like to mention concerns the "Belvedere Effect." This is where, no matter where you are in the world, you are almost certain to bump into someone who came from there. Surprising when you consider how small the place is. When I used to drink in the Leather Bottle public bar with my mates, there was another group of young people who were regular users of the pub. We didn't have anything to do with them and only recognised them from their faces. Imagine my surprise when in December 1967, I was sitting in the airman's mess at RAF Swinderby while doing my basic training, when I saw, sitting opposite me, one of the lads from the other group of Leather Bottle regulars. He had joined up on the same day and was even in the same trade. Funny old world.

HUFFING AND PUFFING

Paul Nuttall trying to switch his brain on

Paul Nuttall, the UK Independence Party deputy chief fruitcake has claimed that moves to ban smoking in public parks are "nonsense." Another of their nut jobs claims that "the smoking ban in public places has damaged more communities than the pit closures did"

The UK Independence Party has pledged to repeal the smoking ban in pubs as it "damages trade." I recall a similar claim made back in 1967 when the breathalyzer was brought in to enforce new laws on drink-driving. UKIP are curiously reticent about whether they would also repeal the drink-driving laws as well.

Here are some interesting facts for you Mr Nuttall. Since your party was founded in 1991, around 2.5 million British people have died prematurely as a direct result of their smoking habit; most of them from the C1 and C2 social group you claim to be so concerned about.

Over the same period, the NHS has had to pay nearly £65 Billion on treating them. The cost to the economy in sickness pay, lost productivity and other costs is around £60 billion.

UKIP says they will spend an additional £12 billion on the NHS in England by 2020. They will need to if they want to be able to pay for treating all those nicotine addicts.

There isn't a figure available for the human cost of this carnage; probably a bit more than a few pit closures.

You may be interested to read some facts about the ban on smoking in cars containing children under 18

World wide, in the lifetime of your party, the World Health Organisation claim that 144 million people have died from smoking related illness, 14.5 million of them because they had to inhale someone else's smoke. 28% of them were children. That's over 4 million children Mr Nuttall. Dead, because there was no ban on smoking in public places.

 
Speaking at his party conference he also had something to say about Jeremy Corbyn. Actually he had a lot to say about him.

Mr Corbyn it seems is a "trendy lefty" rather than a working class hero and suggested that working people would not warm to a man "who says nice things about the IRA, wants to give the Falklands back to the Argentinians and, above all, won't sing the national anthem".

I am glad to see that UKIP, like the tabloid press doesn't like to get diverted by trivia from the real issues of the day. Never mind that Jeremy Corbyn wouldn't use our nuclear deterrent, never mind that he made friends with IRA terrorists or that he would hand the fate of thousands of British people living in the Falklands over to the care of a corrupt third world state .

"HE WON'T SING THE NATIONAL ANTHEM"

 MYSTERIOUS SIGNS

Anyone taking a wander around the Crossness Nature Reserve can't fail to notice a number of strange messages dotted around the place. They are all written on small plastic disks and attached to posts and fences and seem to have been professionally made. I have no idea what they are or what they mean. I don't suppose I ever will.

exterminate! exterminate!

Would be Prime Minister and all round buffoon Nigel Farage wants the BBC to stop making the sort of quality programmes that has made British television the envy of the world and hand over our choice of viewing to the "commercial sector".

A wise decision too. Who wants to watch "Life on Earth" when we could be enthralled by "Ancient Aliens".

"Sherlock" v "Celebrity Big Brother". No competition.

And let's face it, if we really have to decide between "Doctor Who" and "Psychic Detectives" I know which I would choose.

If we scrap the TV licence, that's an extra £145.50 to go towards the £1000 a year Sky contract we all seem happy to pay for.

Here is an example of what BBC1 offers us on Sunday compared with Sky1.

BBC1
6:00pm - Celebrity Mastermind
6:30pm - News
7:00pm - Countryfile

8:00pm - Antiques Roadshow

9:00pm - Poldark

Sky1
6:00pm - The Simpsons
6:30pm - The Simpsons
7:00pm - The Simpsons
7:30pm - The Simpsons
8:00pm - The Simpsons
8:30pm - The Simpsons
9:00pm - Hawaii Five-O

I don't know if this is official UKIP policy; I haven't read their manifesto so I can't say. What I can say is I wouldn't be surprised if it is. Pretty much what we can expect from this bunch of swivel eyed crackpots. 

NUMBER CRUNCHING

There is a major debate going on at the moment about genetically modified organisms and whether they are safe. I'm no expert which is why I tend to take the advice of those who are.

I always wondered why you only ever get anti GMO protesters in countries where the majority of the population is obese.

Number Crunching

and the UKIP Earthquake

Those EU Parliament election results

There are roughly 46 million people registered to vote in the UK.

8.9 million of them voted for the Tory-labour/Lib-dem block (all committed - in varying degrees - to remaining in the EU)  - that's about 19.5% of the total British electorate.  

4.3 million of them voted UKIP - that's 9.5% of the total British electorate.

29.7 million - that's 64% of the total British electorate couldn't care a toss about the European Union and have no interest at all in who runs it, what rules it makes, what effect it has on us, or even whether the UK remains a member, because they didn't bother to vote.

UKIP has around 38,000 members - that's around 0.061% of the British population.

An Earthquake? I think not. Perhaps a mild tremor and even then, only maybe.