GLOBAL WARMING HOAX REVEALED!!!

The most intelligent man who ever lived
shows his opinion on climate change.
(Picture from Time Magazine)

Sensational disclosure by US President Donald Trump proves climate science conspiracy hoax with startling revelations about the trees in California and how small the oceans are.

Anyone concerned about recent inflammatory reports about global warming by the entire scientific community, can rest assured that there is no need to worry. Thanks to the intervention of US President Donald Trump, the truth about all of this can now be disclosed.

Josh Dawsey of the Washington Post asked the President for his reaction to the latest report and his reply can be read here.

"One of the problems that a lot of people like myself. 

We have very high levels of intelligence, but we're not necessarily such believers. 

You look at our air and our water and it's right now at a record clean. But when you look at China and you look at parts of Asia and when you look at South America, and when you look at many other places in the world, including Russia, including – just many other places – the air is incredibly dirty. 

And when you're talking about an atmosphere. 

Oceans are very small. 

And it blows over and it sails over. 

I mean, we take thousands of tons of garbage off our beaches all the time that comes over from Asia. It just flows right down the Pacific, it flows, and we say where does this come from? 

And it takes many people to start off with.

Number two, if you go back and look at articles, they talked about global freezing, they talked about at some point the planet could have freez [sic] to death, then it's going to die of heat exhaustion. 

There is movement in the atmosphere. 

There's no question. 

As to whether or not it's man-made and whether or not the effects that you are talking about are there, I don't see it – not nearly like it is. 

Do we want clean water? Absolutely. Do we want clean air to breath? Absolutely. 

The fire in California, where I was, if you looked at the floor, the floor of the fire they have trees that were fallen, they did no forest management, no forest maintenance, and you can light – you can take a match like this and light a tree trunk when that thing is laying there for more than 14 or 15 months. 

And it's a massive problem in California."

The reference to the recent forest fires in California follow his imaginary conversation with Finland President Sauli Niinistö who told him that they don't have such fires in Finland because they do a lot of raking.

This isn't the first time we have been treated to the views of President Trump on matters of climate change. My earlier post dated 22nd August 2018 gave a transcription of his speech at a fund raising dinner in New York regarding the wisdom of burning more coal.

A (FAR) RIGHT TURN UP FOR THE BOOKS

Massive turnout of EDL supporters as Tommy
Robinson appointed as adviser to UKIP.

Nigel Farage, founder of far-right political party UKIP has expressed his disappointment that a neo-Nazi thug has been taken on by his neo-Nazi party as a special adviser. Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (otherwise known as Tommy Robinson) is now going to be advising UKIP on rape gangs and prison reform.

The latest UKIP leader Gerard Batten (is it my imagination, or do UKIP go through more leaders than the Tories go through Brexit negotiators?) claims that Yaxley-Lennon has "saved the party from oblivion". 

I'm not sure if that should be held against him though. While it's perfectly true that he has a long history of thuggery, drug dealing and, more recently, attempting to get rape case defendants acquitted by sabotaging their trials, I don't think he can honestly be accused of saving this bunch of knuckle-dragging half-wits and their sad excuse of a political party. They are on their way down the toilet as many of their former supporters head back to the BNP, where they came from in the first place.

This story, doing the rounds on Facebook has been around for a few years but it's still worth another outing. Thanks to Mrs Grump for the heads-up.

In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. 

The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, penned by a US resident, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:

"Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighbouring nations. 
A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. 
The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.

4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odour for the Lord - Lev.1:9. 
The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

5. I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. 
Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?

7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help.

Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your adoring fan.

James M. Kauffman, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus, Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia
(It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian)"

IS HE OR ISN'T HE?

Michael Cohen

The latest episode in his car crash of a presidency, Donald Trump's ex lawyer Michael Cohen has just admitted to breaking finance laws in connection with the presidential election in 2016. As part of a plea bargaining agreement, he has admitted that he paid hush money to an assortment of women that Donald Trump has had affairs with over the years. 

As this was, in his own words, "with the intention of influencing the outcome of the election", the payments should have been declared as campaign expenses. Needless to say, they weren't.

His most damming claim is that the payments were made "at the direction of the candidate". That's Donald Trump, in case you are not paying proper attention.

Trump himself however is claiming that Michael Cohen was making up the stories to get a deal.

This leaves an intriguing question. If Michael Cohen made up the story about making the payments, then he must be innocent and should therefore be acquitted. Why would he need to "get a deal"?

Donald Trump should therefore issue him with a Presidential Pardon in order that justice be properly served. He should of course pardon himself at the same time just to make sure.

On the subject of Donald Trump. For those of you who believe that renewable energy is the way to go; don't be fooled by the hype. Donald certainly isn't and he demonstrated the fact with this concise and erudite speech made to supporters at a fund raising dinner in New York recently.

You remember Hilary with the coal, right?

Sitting with the miners at the table?

Remember?

That wasn't so good for her.

So the people of West Virginia and all over.

You look at Wyoming.

You look at so many different places where they just.

Pennsylvania, where they loved what we did.

And it's clean coal and we have the most modern procedures.

But it's a tremendous form of energy in the sense that in a military way – think of it – coal is indestructible.

You can blow up a pipeline, you can blow up the windmills. [Makes boom boom boom noises].

Bing [Mimes shooting a large gun].

That's the end of that one.

If the birds don't kill it first.

The birds could kill it first.

They kill so many birds.

You look underneath some of those windmills, it's like a killing field.

The birds.

But you know, that's what they were going to. They were going to windmills.

And you know, don't worry about when the wind doesn't blow.

I said “What happens when the wind doesn't blow? Well then we have a problem”.

OK good.

They were putting them in the areas where they didn't have much wind, too.

And it's a subsidary. [sic] You need subsidy for windmills.

You need subsidy.

Who wants to have energy where you need subsidy?

So, uh, the coal is doing great.

A roundup of the latest news.

Amber Rudd.

The Home Office has been illegally deporting British citizens who arrived from abroad; most particularly West Indians from the so-called "Windrush" generation who were persuaded by the then government health minister Enoch Powell to come and live and work in Britain. Those who have not already been deported have suffered harassment by various authorities; losing their jobs, being refused benefits and even being refused health care and medical treatment.

Amber Rudd, the Home Secretary responsible for this shameful episode is trying to wriggle out of it by a series of shifting denials that hopefully (once all the other Tory ministers who don't think that she has done anything wrong finally give up and desert her) will result in her swift departure.

First - there weren't any targets, then there were targets but they had only been set at local level and she hadn't been told about them, then there were targets and they had been set at national level and she had been told about them but hadn't read the memo.

The question is then, is Amber Rudd a liar, incompetent or both?

To be clear, the targets were to deport a specific number of immigrants, this had nothing to do with the number who were here illegally; it was simply, "find some people who were not born in the UK and deport them". In this case, it didn't even matter if the immigrants were already British citizens as they had been born in countries that were still regarded as British colonies or dependencies when they arrived here.

This policy will have been set at the highest level and would have most certainly involved government ministers and senior civil servants at the Home Office.

I am all too well aware of policies like this as I encountered them while working for the DWP. Front line advisers were instructed to set jobseekers job seeking conditions that were impossible to comply with so as to be able to meet targets for sanctioning claims for benefits. None of this was ever put in writing so managers could invoke the "plausible deniability" scam if the facts ever became public. Junior staff were made aware that failure to meet these targets would affect their performance assessments at the end of the year and so, also affect their pay and bonuses.

I have no doubt at all that exactly the same regime operated at the Home Office. Hopefully, we will find out.

Art is whatever you can get away with.

(Andy Warhol)

"Half of French museum's art was fake" quotes this article on the BBC news website. 

According to this BBC, the Êtienne Terrus museum in Elne, France has discovered that half the pictures in it's gallery are fake

Why does this not surprise me and why do I find the whole thing entertaining?

The trouble with almost the entire art world is that it is so up it's own backside that it rarely sees the light of day. Time and time again, the whole charade is made to look a fool and the joy is, they never seem to learn.

If it isn't exhibitions featuring the doodlings of a class of 5 year olds being "critically" acclaimed by so-called art experts, then it's the same bunch of self opinionated idiots being fooled by the likes of John Myatt. He would produce fake pictures supposedly by famous artists and sell them to the art world who were entirely taken in by them. He didn't even try very hard; he would buy a modern canvas blank and use paint bought from his local branch of B&Q.

Apparently, many of his paintings still hang in famous galleries around the world and are visited by the most celebrated art experts who are still completely taken in by them.

The Royal Baby

It will be interesting to see whether Donald Trump will want to pay his respects to the new prince, named after Lord Louis Mountbatten who was murdered by his IRA chums in 1979 when he visits the UK this Summer.

The Queen, being the supreme diplomat she is, will no doubt not want to raise the subject but that doesn't stop the rest of us from doing so.

I shall watch this story unfold with interest.

Above, you can see Donald Trump shaking hands with Gerry Adams at an IRA benefit fundraising dinner at the Essex House hotel, New York in 1995 just a few months before they bombed Canary Wharf, killing 2 people.

And now for something completely different.

Wildlife photographer Marcio Cabral had his award winning wildlife photograph "Night Raider" featuring an anteater attacking a termite mound disqualified after it was discovered that the anteater in question was actually of the dead and stuffed variety. However, Mr Cabral claims that the anteater wasn't dead, it was only pining for the Fjords.

For what it's worth, my anteater night picture was also disqualified on similar grounds.

BRITAIN FIRST

Saving Britain again

Marek Zakrocki
"Britain First" hero

Marek Zakrocki, a 48 year old window fitter and active supporter of the patriotic political party known as "Britain First" has been convicted at the Old Bailey after pleading guilty to charges of dangerous driving and assault by beating following his heroic attack on a local hotbed of Islamic extremism which had cunningly disguised itself as the "Spicy Night" Curry Restaurant in Harrow, west London.

Mr Zakrocki, who is actually a Polish immigrant, has been a long-time admirer of British values and at no time did he show how much he has been influenced by them than on the afternoon of  the 23rd of June when, after getting drunk and beating up his Wife, stole his company van and drove it around the area, shouting and swearing at passers by.

His moment of glory came when he was approached by Mr Kamal Ahmed, the Spicy Night Curry Restaurant owner who politely asked him not to park outside the restaurant. Recognising this as merely a prelude to an attack, possibly a suicide bombing, he made his heroic decision to defend the people of Great Britain by disabling the mad Muslim who was obviously intent on mass murder.

Without a thought for his own safety and armed only with a knife, a baton torch and the company van, launched a desperate attack on the Islamic terrorist before he could carry out his fiendish plot, thereby preventing what could have been another atrocity on the streets of London.

Other charges relating to the possession of a knife and of grievous bodily harm were not proceeded with after it was disclosed that his intended victim was only a wog. It was also made clear by defending council Jonathan Lennon that when his client announced that he was "going to kill a Muslim", he only meant it in general terms and in no way was it intended to refer to Mr Ahmed.

Mr Zakrocki will almost certainly only receive a token sentence once US President Donald Trump intervenes on his behalf.

While we are talking about "Britain First"..................

Leader (or possibly deputy leader, I'm not quite sure) Jayda Fransen told a packed hall of supporters at their Annual General Meeting about how she now has a "special relationship" with the US President after he tweeted support for her series of racist videos posted on the party's website.

All of the 70 or so delegates attending cheered wildly as they were told that president Trump's tweet was also endorsed by Nigel Farage who didn't seem to think there was anything wrong with publicising neo-Nazi filth.

After a short interlude when it had to be explained to some of the delegates who Donald Trump was, the meeting was able to get underway again.

SUPPORT IN HIGH PLACES

Britain First finally gets the recognition it deserves from none other than the President of the United States.

Grab 'em by the pussy

Pussy Grabber in Chief, US President Donald Trump has declared his support for neo-Nazi group Britain First by re-tweeting a fake picture, supposedly showing a Muslim migrant attacking a man on crutches, posted by Jayda Fransen who is the group's deputy leader.

Britain First, an organisation made up of an assortment of Nazi trolls, hoax charity collectors and convicted paedophiles and which has links with far right organisations in Europe and banned paramilitary groups in Northern Ireland will be delighted with the latest endorsement of their hate campaign from none other than the US President.

Some very fine people

With his history of supporting Nazi groups in the US, he will be no stranger to the philosophy of Britain First who, compared to some of the people he has been describing as having "some very fine people" in its ranks, must seem quite moderate. 

Ms Fransen is due in court in Belfast on the 14th of December to face charges relating to a so-called "Northern Ireland Against Terrorism" rally earlier in the year.

As you can tell, Britain First are not very good at irony.

Just so you are clear about the activities of Britain First, I will show the video (no apology for repeating it) of the group's leader Paul Golding trying to con people out of their money on a fake charity stall. He was originally claiming that he was raising money for injured servicemen but eventually admitted that the money was going into his own pocket. You will also be interested to know that they are still using images of murdered soldier Lee Rigby in their publicity material despite being asked not to by his family.

Hydrate your way to a fortune

This is one bandwagon
you definitely need to jump on.

First, you need to start up your company. Because you are going to be appealing to a customer base that's mostly made up of the scientifically illiterate, it's best to give it a seemingly healthy name but which doesn't actually mean anything.

Don't use "Aquapura", that's already been taken but something like "Hydrapure", that should do. Now register it in somewhere like the Cayman Islands or such like; with all that money you are going to be making, you really don't want to be paying tax on your profits.

Now follow these easy steps:-

1. Take 500,000 litres of tap water.
Cost - £394.00

2. Run it through a carbon filter system to remove any impurities.

Carbon filter system c. £350.00

3. Decant it into 500ml plastic bottles.

1 million plastic bottles at 5p each - total £2000.00

Total cost - £2744.00

4. Sell them for 80p each.

1 million 500ml bottles of water at 80p each = £800,000

Gross profit = £797,256

5. Laugh all the way to the bank.

Or, if you want to make real money -

Follow steps 1 and 2 as above.

Cost - £750

3.Infuse the water with Heleometric Quantum Particles™.

Cost - £0.00

4. Realign it's metaphormic vibrational resonance with the octave of purity.

Cost - £0.00

5. Using your patented Quantum Hexagonal Metatronic Adjustment Technique™, recalibrate it's mutagenic elements to create a Paradigm Healing Field™.

Cost - £0.00

6. Decant it into 500ml plastic bottles.

1 million plastic bottles at 5p each - total £2000.00

7. Sell them for £2.99 each.

1 million 500ml bottles of water at £2.99 each - £2,990,000

Gross profit - £2,987,256

8. Laugh all the way to the bank.

If you are able to get Gwyneth Paltrow to recommend it as part of a vaginal detox programme, you could even get away with charging a fiver a bottle.

If you think this is a joke, read this:-

https://spoonuniversity.com/lifestyle/why-bottled-water-is-the-biggest-scam-of-the-century

Pardon?

Pardon?

There seems to be increasing evidence that Donald Trump, or at least, people who are close to him conspired with Russian officials to sabotage the recent American Presidential elections in order to get him elected. 

It would certainly benefit the Russians to have Donald Trump as President. With their own international reputation on the rocks following their recent annexation of neighbouring countries and complicity in the gassing of civilians caught up in the civil war in Syria, they would hope that a loose cannon like Trump would take the heat off them somewhat as the World community directs it's attention to whatever his car crash of an administration does next.

No! - Covfefe

To someone like Donald Trump, it's a win-win situation. He gets to be President and creates a new American Utopia, and if he gets caught - well, all he has to do is use his presidential powers to pardon himself and anyone else involved.

When I first read the story about how Donald Trump was claiming he could pardon anyone "including himself", to be honest, I was looking for the source, assuming it would be The Onion, The Daily Mash or some other similar satirical publication. Or, possibly they had got him confused with that other great leader, Robert Mugabe who I could easily believe could say such a thing. But no, he really did say it. Perhaps that what he meant by the term "covfefe".

(Covfefe.

cov-fee-fee : verb (used with object)

To free from guilt. To absolve from sin.

"I am going to invoke "Covfefe", announced the President, turning guilt into innocence.)

FREE THE BONEHEAD ONE

I've just been informed by fellow blogger Arthur Pewty and since confirmed by the BBC that my old friend, champion of free speech and human rights, Joshua Bonehill-Paine, has been sent down for 3 years after being convicted of inciting racial hatred.

He has been inciting racial hatred for years but this is the first time he has actually been convicted of the offence. This followed a series of posts on Twitter containing "vile and anti-Semitic material" ahead of a planned rally in Golder's Green, according to the prosecution. 

He is the same person who was convicted back in 2014 after posting hoax messages about a pub in Leicester, claiming that the pub was banning service personnel in case it offended immigrants.

To be honest, I'm really disappointed with Joshua. He took the trouble to send a threatening email to Arthur Pewty after he reported my campaign against the witty and informative Daily Bale but never tried anything with me. I guess it's because I'm just too scary.

With him now put away for the foreseeable future, I am going to have to find another cause to champion. Fortunately there are plenty to choose from. Britain First is my first choice, (geddit?) closely followed by a scam artist who goes by the unlikely name of David Avocado Wolfe and whose posts regularly turn up on my Facebook page.

TOLD YOU SO

You read it here first.

As predicted by my earlier post, footballing legend Jose Mourinho has finally been sacked by Chelsea Football Club after stating that he "had their full support".

Anyone who follows football, and even those of us who don't, are in no doubt as to the fate of any manager who has the "full support" of his club. Those magic few words that turn "if" into "when" were pronounced by Chelsea in October and started the clock ticking down to doomsday for Jose.

Strangely enough, according to the BBC, other managers are surprised that he has been sacked, citing the fact that he is their most successful manager ever, winning them three league titles, the FA Cup and three League Cups.

How can they be so naive? Being successful has nothing to do with it. Football managers are sacked on a regular basis regardless of their performance and go on the merry-go-round of hiring and firing that is a familiar part of the football tradition. 

You sack your manager due to poor performance and hire someone else who has just been sacked by their team for poor performance. This is the way it has always been done.

It seems that a fellow called Guus Hiddink is in line for the job. Sounds about right. He is well qualified as he has already been sacked by Chelsea once already and has since been leaving a trail of destruction across Europe. Good luck.

I'M NOT SURE I LIKE THIS

Facebook is to introduce a dislike button although quite what this means is not made clear. Do I dislike a post because it contains something I dislike? Do I dislike it because someone has commented on something I dislike? Do I dislike it because I don't like the person who made the post?*

What is really alarming is that it could be used to do someone real harm. Think about it, how many times have you liked a post because it will help a sick child or make Amazon or Microsoft et al to pay for some poor person's operation? 

If you dislike that post, will it make the person sicker? Or make Amazon or Microsoft et al raid your bank account and make you poorer?

Just think, enough dislikes, or even "amen" spelt backwards could kill someone. A dangerous weapon in the wrong hands.

Personally, I think this should be banned on health and safety grounds. In fact, I think I will dislike it as soon as it arrives.

*Thinking about this, perhaps we should have lots of different buttons for all of these. There could be a competition to design them. Personally, I would like a button which says, why are you posting this crap on my page? I would use that a lot, especially on Britain First and David Bloody Avocado Wolfe ones.

THAMESMEAD GOLF COURSE

A couple of weeks ago, I noticed workmen securing the site of the old golf course in Thamesmead. They had already removed the netting alongside the footpath and were installing new fencing around the driving range. They were also securing the windows in the clubhouse with metal screens.

I have never been able to get any response from anybody to enquiries about the fate of the site but one of my regular readers has had more success although there still seems to be no clear decision made.

Part of the problem lies with ownership and responsibility for maintenance. The land is owned by Tilfen, which in turn is part of the Peabody Group who lease it to a company called Parpost Ltd. Parpost are responsible for the maintenance and access issues and their only activity in this regard was to block access to the public footpath with a huge ditch. Perhaps the new fencing is down to them.

Peabody themselves have what they call a "final map" which shows the golf course site as a "large scale sports and leisure park". Let's hope so.

 VERY 21st CENTURY

The latest Pope, who goes by the name of Francis is supposed to be a progressive (whatever that means) and is trying to make the Church more relevant in the 21st century.

In this image, he is seen to be driving out demons possessing a man sitting in a wheelchair. 

The Church later published a retraction saying that it wasn't an exorcism, rather a blessing. In any case, it didn't work as the man says that there are still demons inside him.

He has now decided that he is going to declare Mother Teresa a Saint because she has miraculously cured two people of cancer .

The first involved the bogus claim that an Indian woman was cured of cancer after putting a picture of Mother Teresa on her stomach. This laughably absurd claim which has been dismissed out of hand by rationalists, and more importantly, the Doctors who treated her, had been cited by the Roman Catholic Church as proof of a miracle.

The second miracle supposedly cured a man in Brazil of several brain tumours after his Priest prayed for Mother Teresa's intervention with God. So far, there is no more information about this case that I have been able to find but I would be willing to bet that there is a lot more to the story than we are hearing; assuming that the whole thing isn't fake anyway.

If the Catholic Church is going to continue parading this superstitious medieval nonsense then the 21st century is still a long way away.

DUMB AND DUMBER

Anyone following the campaigns of the Republican candidates for the US Presidential elections will be getting increasingly alarmed at the prospect of Donald Trump winning, and even actually getting his finger on the nuclear trigger. What some of you may not realise is that this American version of our own Nigel Farage is not the craziest of the bunch. 

Amazing as it might seem, there are names on the candidates list that make even him look like a beacon of sanity.

Step forward Ben Carson.

Now if you look at his career as a successful neurosurgeon, he has an impressive track record. He was the Director of Paediatric Neurosurgery at the prestigious John Hopkins Hospital in Maryland with his work being recognised with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2008.

The problem starts when he lets his religious views cloud his judgement; these have the effect of making him look like he is at least a couple of side plates short of a dinner service.

He claims that Charles Darwin proposed his "theory of evolution through natural selection" because of Satan. As far as I am aware, Satan isn't mentioned even once in his book. (I do own a copy, bought from Down House when I visited a couple of years ago, although I haven't gotten round to reading it yet).

When he gets onto the subject of the pyramids though, he stops flying round the ceiling light of sanity and starts bumping into the crackpot window.

According to Ben Carson, the pyramids were built by the Biblical Joseph to store grain and that the mummies were used as scarecrows to scare the birds away. No mummies have ever been found in the pyramids by the way.

He also believes that the pyramids have pointy tops to prevent blimps from landing on them. The fact that blimps didn't exist at the time just shows how forward thinking the Ancient Egyptians were.

On the Subject of Joseph, he also claims that the "coat of many colours" described in the Bible was in fact only black and white and brown. It seems that in those days black and white were the only colours, as you can see from old television footage, and it was the first time anyone had seen brown.

Vote for Donald Trump anybody?

  

HAPPY FAMILIES

I know I keep posting pictures of Seals on the Thames foreshore but I think they're cute and it's my blog, so there.

This is a small family of Common Seals that have been seen pretty much in the same place now for a couple of weeks. There are two adults and a juvenile who seems to be losing its baby fur. You can spot them on the mud in front of the Power Station water outlet, near the golf course. 

By the way, you can get involved in the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) Thames Marine Mammal Survey by going to this page and reporting what you have seen.

Junior having fun in the mud

Playing with Dad

Mum and Dad

Family group

Here they are again